Wednesday, July 24, 2013

If We Don't Avenge The Death of Judge Rosales, Then Justice Will Go to Hell In This Land! (an article by Max Soliven of the Philippine Star)



This is an article by Max Soliven of the Philippine Star. It was an editorial made on June 16, 2004 or six days after my dad was assassinated. I remember at this time, my head was in a blur. In fact, a lot of what happened to me between June 10, 2004 and a few years after is still a blur to me now. I do have some very sharp memories (some full of pain and some full of anger), but for the life of me, I don't remember reading this article.

I posted it just in case, in the eternal database of the internet, it is lost and so the article is saved somewhere.

Of course, I give full credit to the author Mr. Max V. Soliven of the Philippine Star. A link the the article can be found here.





If we don't avenge the murder of Judge Rosales, then justice will go to hell in this land!

 0  0 googleplus0  0 
Let's leave for the moment the pompous and portentous nonsense of the nitpicking "canvass" in Congress – with our politicians still debating and spouting platitudes for the benefit of TV mileage – and focus our attention on the harsh challenges and hard realities that threaten our society today.


No matter whose name finally pops up as winner in the final canvass, we’ve already elected a President. What we must know is whether we can defeat the crime and violence that threaten the everyday lives of Filipinos everywhere. That’s the real nitty-gritty.


Last Thursday, June 10, for example, a courageous judge – Executive Judge Voltaire Rosales, 48, of Tanauan, Batangas, was insolently shot to death by a motorcycle-riding assassin at almost high noon – just 100 meters away from the court room where he had just finished the cases of the day.


The unknown killer waited for the judge, who was driving his own car, to slow down at the hump, then opened fire. He shot Judge Butch Rosales in the arm, crippling him and causing him to slump forward, then shot again. This time the bullet pierced his victim’s neck veins, then another the judge’s head, just above the left ear. The assailant sped off, with a back-up vehicle tailing him (carrying no car plate) and remains at large.


Despite his fatal injuries, the stricken judge managed to open his car door and slumped to the ground. Police arrived minutes later and brought him to a nearby hospital. The hospital had no ambulance, and the municipality itself had only one (which was not available), so the judge’s wife, Atty. Nena Rosales, had to beg Batangas Governor Dodo Mandanas to help get an ambulance to transport the slain jurist’s body – and this was only managed three hours after his death.


The victim of this cold-blooded murder, Butch Rosales, was one of our country’s bravest and most accomplished judges. He had taken up grade school in Letran College, graduated from Bauan High School, gone to De La Salle University, and finally obtained his law degree from the Ateneo de Manila College of Law.


He passed the Bar in 1981 with distinction, placing No. 25 with an average of 84.5 percent. After law school, he had worked as an associate for the De Santos, Balgos and Perez Law Office, then with his father-in-law, former Assemblyman Rafael "Paeng" Legaspi (Batasang Pambansa from 1984-85) as supervising staff officer. He was legal counsel to the UNIDO Aklan Chapter, then a Solicitor in the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) from 1986 to 1995. He was appointed Executive Judge of Regional Trial Court Branch 83, Tanauan, Batangas, in 1995. Now, he is dead.


Who had the motive to have him killed? There’s a short list for the police and National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to consider.


Our lawmen must track down this vicious murderer, his confederates, and the mastermind who dispatched that "killer team" – and nail their hides to the wall. Otherwise, the butchers and bullies will know they can "get away with murder" and everything else with impunity. Abolish the death penalty? The death penalty was created for and must be imposed on such rats!


Judge Butch had a passion for his work and had dedicated his life to dispensing justice evenly and fairly for all. As a "heinous crime" judge, he heard cases involving rapists, drug dealers and manufacturers, and kidnap-for-ransom gangsters, aside from the regular load of RTC Judges such as theft, land-grabbing, and other civil cases. Rosales had the reputation of treating the rich, poor, the powerful and the powerless with equality and impartiality in his court. Efficient, hardworking and thoughtful in his deli-beration of cases, Rosales completed a record-breaking number of decisions per year.


As a heinous crime judge, Rosales handed out five death sentences in his short career, earning him the reputation of a tough "hukom bitay" judge (hanging Justice judge). The past and present cases he handled were, among others, (1) People of the Philippines versus German Agojo, who was sentenced to death for drug pushing; (2) Vs. Nestor Guelos et al. involving the slaying of Major Camacho, Chief of Police of Tanauan. Guelos was sentenced to 8 to 12 years imprisonment (3) vs. Millano Muji et al. (sentenced to death for kidnapping with homicide, robbery, and carnapping in the case concerning a son-in-law of business taipan John Gokongwei; (4) vs. Benito Simbahan involving illegal possession of prohibited drugs and two counts of murder; (5) vs. Romy Rose Agojo for violation of Section 2, Article 5, R.A. No. 9165, or drug pushing.


Who of those he had "angered" by dispensing justice had commanded Judge Rosales murdered?
* * *
What’s disgraceful, I think, is also the manner in this upright judge has been callously treated by his own Department of Justice (DOJ) after his assassination.


His body was brought to Funeraria Paz for the required autopsy conducted by the NBI. His sister-in-law, Dr. Carrie Legaspi, being a doctor, volunteered to be present at the autopsy.


The examination by the medico-legal physician was routinely conducted. That’s not the problem. The problem is that the DOJ "forgot" to send a flag – as a judge fallen in the service of his country deserves – to be draped on his coffin.


It took his sister-in-law, who’s also barangay captain of DasmariƱas Village (Makati), to bring a Philippine flag. When the judge’s widow, Nena, paid a call on the Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. early Monday morning or four days later, Dr. Legaspi candidly told the Chief Justice that he hadn’t even "given" Judge Rosales’ coffin a flag. Later in the day, the Chief Justice sent over a flag, and followed this up with a visit to the burol (wake) where he attended the Mass there, then promised to attend the burial Mass – which was yesterday.


The bereaved widow, Nena, a lawyer herself, says that Butch’s death "should be a wake-up call to our judiciary and our nation".


She complained about the current set-up. In the previous system, heinous crimes (she pointed out) were handled by all the judges, through what is known as the raffle system. Following "reforms", it was noted, there now seem to be specific courts wherein there is a family court and a heinous crime court, etc. Heinous crime courts handle civil cases on top of all the heinous crimes involving kidnappers, drug pushers, rapists, and murderers.


"The heinous crime judge then becomes the target of every evil element of our society, because they have the burden of giving judgement to the lawless elements who will kill anyone in their way!"


She noted that it’s been the practice for bodyguards to be requested by a threatened judge from the local mayor. However, the DOJ advised judges not to ask any "favors" from local mayors. "So the question is: Where do we stand? There is this vagueness or lack of clarity with regard to providing protection for judges who lay their lives on the line as they pass judgement on the lawless elements of society."


"In the previous system," Mrs. Nena Rosales recalled, "cases involving heinous crimes and other cases were brought to Manila for decision. This was changed to the concept of solving everything in the locality – to decongest court load, perhaps a good answer. But think of it: when a decision adversely made against one person versus another is made, somehow those in the locality react more personally. Therefore, each and every working hour, the judge is constantly in peril. There must be a better solution."
* * *
What I’d like to ask myself – and you must, too, is the burning question: Is the Philippines now the Colombia, or worse, the Sicily of Asia, where judges and prosecutors can be killed with immunity?


RTC Judge Voltaire "Butch" Rosales is the fourth RTC judge slain in the past three years!


Here’s the score:


In October 2001, Ilocos Norte RTC Judge Ariston Rubio was ambushed along the national highway in Batac. Six months after Judge Rubio, Compostela Valley RTC Judge Eugenio Valles was shot dead by two motorcycle-riding killers.


In September 2002, Tayug (Pangasinan) RTC Judge Oscar Uzon also met the same fate.


The murders of Judges Rubio, Valles and Uzon are unsolved up to now. Will the murder of Judge Rosales also be unsolved by the NBI and the PNP.


Though it is the unwritten law of vendetta that "omerta" or silence must rule in Sicily, that notorious Mafia-enclave, witnesses have still come forth and many killers and masterminds responsible for the assassination of judges and prosecutors have been arrested, prosecuted and convicted by courageous magistrates in Palermo.


In sad contrast with the murders of our judges remaining unsolved, several trial court judges (especially those presiding over heinous crimes-designated courts) may now fear for their lives. Among the cases pending before these heinous crimes courts are drug-related cases.


It is not only trial court judges who have been threatened.


Members of the Supreme Court have also been threatened by various means. One member of the High Court had his van and car "acid bombed". When acid was thrown at his car by a motorcycle-riding man, the justice was in the vehicle on his way home. The message delivered was clear. Those behind the acid-throwing were "announcing" they could get the justice anytime they want.


Another member of the Court was threatened by means of a funeral wreath delivered early in the morning at the gate of his house. The "message" to this justice was that he should rule favorably on a high-profile case assigned to him.


To their credit, the members of the High Court though threatened were not cowed. They resolved the cases assigned to them without fear, strictly in accordance with law.


Those behind the assassination of judges have taken the law into their own blood-stain hands. They have arrogated unto themselves the power to "discipline" members of the judiciary with the bullet.


We must get the killers of those four judges! But we must begin with bagging, and mercilessly meting out justice, to the murderers of Judge Butch Rosales.


This is imperative if we are to keep our society safe and sane!

Monday, July 22, 2013

Incorruptible Judge Gets Ka Pepe Diokno Award


A long overdue post (sorry dad!). This was an article released a year after my Dad was killed.

The original link to the Philstar.com webpage can be found here (Click me!) The photos are not posted on the site but here's an excerpt of the text:



by Joanne Ramirez Tuesday March 8, 2005 Incorruptible Judge Voltaire Y. Rosales gets Pepe Diokno Award (Click on the photo for a larger picture)

"His brain was splattered on the ground. They shot him on the head to show their hatred at the fact that he could not be controlled, that he had his own mind," lawyer Filomena "NenaRosales, widow of Batangas Judge Voltaire "ButchRosales, once painfully recalled in a press interview. Butch, a heinous-crime judge, was mercilessly shot by motorcycle-riding gunmen on June 10 last year. He was on his way home from work.


We are sure Nena would have rather been an ordinary wife than the widow of a hero. But it may give her consolation that Butch’s courageous work has not been forgotten. Last week, Butch was posthumously conferred the first "Ka Pepe Diokno Award" as a champion of human rights. The award was established by the De La Salle Professional Schools, Inc. Graduate School of Business (DLS-PSI-GSB), which marked another milestone with the establishment also of the Jose W. Diokno Distinguished Professorial Chair in Business Law and Human Rights.


Launched at the DLS-PSI GSB RCBC Campus in Makati City, the professorial chair was established in honor of Senator Diokno’s remarkable achievements in his political career. The late senator is best remembered as a street parliamentarian during martial law days, who fought for the preservation of justice and democracy in the Philippines. Most of all, Senator Diokno made a mark as a human rights advocate and for benchmarking the humanized system of taxation in the country."



Sunday, July 21, 2013

Happy Happy Birthday to my dear second mom, Dra Carrie Legaspi Vicerra MD !

Barangay Captain of Dasmarinas Village Ma Encarnacion "Carrie" Legaspi with her kagawads and SK Chairman


Just a happy whole hearted happy birthday greet to my second mom, my tita (auntie) Carrie Legaspi Vicerra!

More popularly known as Dra Carrie Legaspi, Tita was the Barangay Captain of Dasmarinas Village, Makati City.

former Dasmarinas Village Barangay Captain Doctor Ma Encarnacion "Carrie" R Legaspi M.D.


Tita, who is a practicing dermatologist has her own clinic. Visit her at http://www.totalskincareph.com I can personally vouch that she's malambing (warm / loving) but straight to the point. She takes care of all her patients and makes it a personal commitment to make every patient feel like they're taken care of like family.


Why do I love her? Cause she's a tough cookie with the guts and fortitude to  do what has to be done because it's right.

Happy birthday Tita! Love you and thank you for always being there for me.

Doctor, leader, and loving tita (aunt)





Saturday, July 20, 2013

Happy Birthday To My Dear Mom, Attorney / Barangay Captain Ma Filomena Legaspi Rosales !



Happy Birthday to my mom, Dasmarinas Village, Makati Barangay Captain / Chairman Ma Filomena Legaspi Rosales!

Thanks for all the hard work you've done for us. I know it is not easy with dad gone, but you deserve credit for being not just a great family mom, but a person for others!

Check out the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper clipping below. As part of the Ateneo Law Alumni Association Inc (ALAAI) and the Ateneo Law Board of Advisors, mom brought together the Santuario de San Antonio, Forbes Park ministry, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) and the Ateneo Law School into a partnership where law students do legwork for PAO to lighten their load in protecting the underprivileged.





Mom, you've not only helped our family grow, but you've helped others survive the rough world we live in. Kudos to you, we love you!

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Happy Mother's Day to my wonderful and beautiful mom, Dasmarinas Village, Makati Barangay Captain Attorney Ma Filomena "Nena" Legaspi Rosales!



I'm here to give a loud shout out to my mom, the ever so beautiful and talented, widowed very young, but loyal and faithful till the end; strong willed mother of two lawyers, Vic and Lala,

Barangay Captain of Dasmarinas Village, Makati, Attorney Ma Filomena "Nena" Legaspi-Rosales.


Barangay Captain of Dasmarinas Village, Makati Atty. Ma. Filomena "Nena" Legaspi-Rosales
taken from the DVA Village Gazette June 2008

I am so thankful and proud you are my mom. I know when Dad was killed you were left with a big plate to fill for us, your kids, but you did well, no, you did great! you got us through college, law school and now you raised two full fledged lawyers. I can't think of many other women who are as strong and dedicated to their children as you. I love you mom. 

Friday, April 26, 2013

My 2 Centavos on the 2012 Philippine Bar Exam and Why the Passing Rate was Low



I've been reading a few editorials and news pieces on the results of the 2012 Philippine Bar Exam.

Some of them I posted here, but just in case, here are a few links with excerpts:

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/377315/17-hurdle-2012-bar-exams

"Lawyer Joan Largo, dean of the University of San Carlos’ (USC) College of Law, expressed dismay over how last year’s bar examinations was conducted.
“The results do not reflect the competence of the bar examinees. The low passing rate in the 2012 bar examinations was really brought about by the unreasonable length of the exam,” she told Cebu Daily News.
Largo said bar examinees were asked to answer a set of 100-point multiple choice questions (MCQ) and another 100-point essay at the same time.
“It was physically and humanly impossible to answer the questions sensibly given the short period of time. It’s really hard. I give credit to all bar examinees,” she said.


Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/377315/17-hurdle-2012-bar-exams#ixzz2OoubzZ56
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook



My review table for my 4 years in law school


http://opinion.inquirer.net/49307/lawyer-dominated-society


When the bar exam results were announced on Wednesday, the social media were abuzz with congratulations for friends, but some asked a perennial question: Why all the hoopla for the bar exam, but not for the board exam results for doctors, accountants, engineers, pharmacists, etc.? Why the fixation over one profession, and over a licensing test?
Indeed. After all, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. had long ago said that “the black-letter man may be the man of the present, but the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics.” Why, in the 21st century, are we still enthralled by a profession that “do[esn’t] understand technology and balance sheets” and instead “hires out its words and its anger”?

The fault lies not in our stars but in ourselves. We have yielded too much power to the government, and that power has found its way to the lawyers. Rather than rely on a free market, we have installed the state as the dispenser of wealth and business opportunities, and assigned the lawyers’ guild as the mediator. So why act surprised that they have aggrandized the power we surrendered to them?

But it isn’t just about power. It’s also about legitimacy. The Marcos dictatorship deglamorized the lawyers by idealizing the technocratic state, elevating an elite of number-crunchers backed by a corps of military bone-crushers. And that is why the heroes of the mainstream anti-Marcos movement were the human rights lawyers of the old FLAG and Mabini. Today, that poetic image of lawyering continues to inspire.


Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/49307/lawyer-dominated-society#ixzz2Op4caBTW
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook


This is the list of 2012 Bar Exam Passers (Disclosure, I'm one of them)
http://www.philstar.com/exam-results/2013/03/20/921986/complete-list-2012-bar-exams-passers

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/376867/2012-bar-result-is-second-lowest-passing-rate-in-history-sc-committee


The bar examination committee of the Supreme Court on Wednesday said the result of the 2012 bar examination was second lowest passing rate in the history of professional licensure examination for lawyers in the Philippines.
A total of 17.76 percent or 949 out of 5,343 passed the 2012 bar examination, the Supreme Court announced Wednesday. It added 5,686 of examinees but only 5,343 completed the four Sunday examinations.


Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/376867/2012-bar-result-is-second-lowest-passing-rate-in-history-sc-committee#ixzz2Op6vlTOq
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook




I'm not here to write about those who passed the 2012 bar, but to give context and a theory on why the 2012 bar had such a low passing rate.

For more background on the Philippine bar I suggest you Google "Philippine bar exam wiki".

The Philippine bar before 2011 was in pure essay format. By essay I mean it could be objective enumeration, legal analysis or an opinion, but the answers (the words and sentences) came from your mind and had to be written down on the answer sheet. The questions would give hints through subtle contextual elements to guide you on what kind of answer the examiner was looking for or sometimes the questions were just plainly ambiguous so you had to write all you knew. That was how it was done since the first bar exam in 1900.

There has never been a standard Philippine bar exam. The law, unlike the human body or answers to a mathematical numbers test, constantly changes, evolving with the people as they change. Oliver Wendell Homes Jr. is famous for his quote "the life of law is not logic; it has been experience". The law changes because people change. Women and african-americans used to be disenfranchised a century ago, now they are not because the people and the law changed.

That is why the bar exams change every year. Yes, there are general rules and principles law students must learn, but these change in time, and depending on the examiners and the head of the bar exams for the year, the scope and concentration on particular topics can change i.e. a law passed in the middle of 2012 will most likely not be part of the 2012 bar but, if it is significant enough to affect society (amendments to anti-money laundering), it will come out in the 2013 bar.

The essay-type bar exams usually had twenty questions. Every number could be just one question or have sub-questions ("nanganganak"). The sub-questions could relate to the previous question or the story of the question or have nothing to do at all with the main question or sub-questions.

The Bar exams are usually held on four consecutive sundays. The 2011 bar was held in November. The 2012 bar was held in October. Before then, it was in September, and long ago it was held in October like the 2012. My bar had 8 subjects. 4 were major subjects and 4 were minor. We also had a legal writing portion where we had to craft a legal opinion.

After about a hundred years, I'm guessing it became a bit tedious to conduct and check an exam where the scope kept increasing every year (more laws being passed and more Supreme Court rulings called jurisprudence adding or changing doctrines or principles of law). Adding to the burden was the increasing number of applicants. Back in the early 80's my parents took the bar and they had a passing rate of about 50%. Back then there were about 1700 taking the exam.

In 2011 they tried a pure multiple choice question and answer format (MCQ). The 4 major subjects had 100 MCQ questions each with 4 possible answers given per question. The 4 minor subjects had 75 MCQs. Then they had a legal writing portion to test the applicant's ability to construct a legal opinion or memorandum. Because of the new format the head of the bar exam, Justice Roberto Abad, required all MCQ answers to be noticeably different from each other so that the examinee, if he knew the correct one, could easily pick it out. I'm pretty sure crafting the questions and answers was pretty hard for the examiner because they probably had a pool of more than 100 questions per subject and only compiled them the day before the exam and had to make sure each of the MCQs followed the instructions of Justice Abad.

Bar applicants that year were told to read codals (for non-law people, that means just the text of the laws without annotations from authors) because with such a big pool of questions per subject the only consistent text were the laws themselves. Authors of annotations sometimes have different interpretations of laws. For 2012, we were told to read everything (but not just anything) because of the essay portion.

This was my book queue for the bar (not seen are the books on the reading table and in a box) 


In 2012, there were almost 6,000 applicants.  The format changed again (nice to have guinea pigs), but this time they gave both MCQs and essay tests. The number of questions did not change for each format and the time per test did not increase significantly.

We were allowed to choose which part we wanted to answer first, either the 100 question MCQ or the 20 question (with sub-questions) essay. Having both questionnaires given at the same time and knowing that a variety of topics would be asked in the MCQ, most chose the MCQ to deal with first. I answered the MCQ first because it would be easier to dump all the knowledge on different topics for 100 questions right away than wait till my brain was more tired from answering.

 The problem with answering MCQs is that the brain uses a different process; elimination. I read the question, looked at the answers, and eliminated each, one by one till I was sure the only one left was likely correct. I did this even if I knew the answer already because I knew that the examiners would probably make two answers slightly similar so I had to be sure that I wasn't getting baited too early.

Answering 100 MCQs gets you into a rhythm. When you get to the essay part, your mind has to adjust from just crossing answers off, to creating answers and composing them into coherent and concise sentences. You do not have time to write everything you know (although shotgunning it is safer than not writing anything). If you want to write legibly so that the examiner won't get annoyed reading your answer, you have to write neatly and in big letters. That takes up more time if you're like me and you have chicken scratch for handwriting. Using cursive for me was not safe so I had to write in big letters which took up more time. I do remember writing in script a few answers because I was rushing, but to compensate I wrote in very big letters. My one sentence in cursive looked like a paragraph but at least I was more comfortable knowing that the one checking the exam wouldn't have a reason to not read my answer in whole.

Lets not forget the usefulness of trending. Trending is done both in law school and during the bar. Students and barristers (not to be confused with Starbuck's barristas) look at previous exams and use statistics to see what topics, scenarios and questions tend to come up during tests. The importance of trending is noticeable when you take an essay-type exam. If the trending tips are mostly correct, you have a higher chance of hitting the target grade because you'll be able to focus and study on the topics that matter. If you have 20 essay questions and trending gets 15 questions you will more or less get 75% of the test within the scope of your review, it doesn't necessarily mean you will pass, but at least you'll be within a comfort zone to shotgun answer. In a 100 question MCQ exam, if trending gets 15 questions, you get 15 out of 100. Obviously, trending becomes less useful. Now if you have both essay and MCQ, you pray that the one making the MCQ doesn't know the one making the essay is asking the same thing. That way you can use the MCQ part to answer the essay. If they intentionally make the essay so different in topic from the MCQ, then you've just increased the amount of information the bar examinee has to recall in four hours. I remember feeling that some MCQ questions during my bar were so esoteric that I wondered if the examiner was just running out of common topics to ask so he/she just looked at some obscure-never-taught part of vast Philippine law and just asked it to fill in a quota.

My first language is non-understandable english. My second language is english and tagalog. The bar exam is in english. I know of many brilliant classmates in law school who knew the law but could not read fast enough or express themselves properly in english. If they did, it took them more time. The 2012 bar was a load of english reading and I can imagine hundreds of competent law students translating the question from english to tagalog or bisaya, answering in their first language, then translating their answer back to english in their head, then writing it in concise, understandable and legible english in the answer book. That's a long process when you have about 4 hours to answer everything. Forget it if you don't even know the answer to the question in the first place.

Besides the test, the examinee has to deal with the usual emotional stress and pressure that builds up right before the bar. An applicant has to balance the copious amounts of caffeine and sleep to make sure that on every sunday of test month, their brain is in optimal shape. All the studying won't help if you're too tired or sleepy to comprehend.

The boxes of reading materials for 4 years worth (excluding text books) I read all of it!


In sum, the aspiring lawyer deals with heaps of reading material on topics that change faster than the human body can mutate. The bar is the final step in validating 4 to 6 years of formal studying (If one is not delayed, law school proper is 4 years plus 1 year for bar review). The 2012 bar was longer than previous bars with a scope that required the examinee to recall copious amounts of information in just a short time. Hopefully, future bars will be adjusted to allow those with the dream of becoming a lawyer the opportunity to be an officer of the court.


If you have any questions about the 2012 bar, feel free to tweet me @viclr33





Sunday, March 24, 2013

Lawyer-dominated society

Lawyer-dominated society

An editorial by the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

A very apt description on why we, Filipinos, look at lawyers so highly.

I personally believe we do need more engineers, doctors, architects etc., but this is what fate has given me, and I should count my lucky stars I was given the opportunity by my parents to become one.

One day, the provinces will be given better access to education and information in general. That way, being a lawyer will be more about defending human rights and protecting the way of life we believe in than   being a good option as a candidate.

Don't get me wrong, getting to be a lawyer is no easy task and it is the path of least resistance to acknowledge those who have worked that hard for their accomplishment. What I am saying is that we need more professions to give voice to the people.

A doctor will have a different view on how to run things based on their professional experience, same with an engineer and nurse, and as a democracy, we will better evolve if we are able to assimilate all views from different professions into the system which maintains our way of life.

ShareThis